The Oregonian's Bill Monroe!

Go Back   www.ifish.net > Ifish Fishing and Hunting > Ifish Community

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-31-2012, 10:23 PM   #1
Uglygreen
King Salmon
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tigard, Oregon
Posts: 5,893
Default Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

So, I have caught Sockeye incidentially while Summer Steelhead fishing. I know thy are not great biters, but wanted to hear ideas for targeting these tasty little fish.

1) Anyone had any consistant luck with Columbia River Sockeye?

2) What methods and rigging seem to work best?

3) As we have to tag Sockeye but they don't have to be clipped as most are unclipped hatchery fish, would you support a rule change to allow recording on a hatchery harvest card?
__________________
www.anglersrental.com
Uglygreen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 05:36 AM   #2
hawg boss
Tuna!
 
hawg boss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 1,341
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uglygreen View Post

3) As we have to tag Sockeye but they don't have to be clipped as most are unclipped hatchery fish, would you support a rule change to allow recording on a hatchery harvest card?
No.

I would support a rule change that requires the release of all Sockeye.

Last year there were 3 populations of Sockeye in the Columbia. This year there should be 4 with Sockeye expected to return to the Deschutes. Snake river fish are esa listed, Deschutes fish are a restoration project. There should be no harvest on either of these populations.

Okanagan River Sockeye are increasing thanks to a large restoration project.

http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/stories/okanagan.htm
http://www.obtwg.ca/pdf/ORRIBrochure.PDF

Does Washington even have a hatchery harvest card? If the answer is no, Why should people in Oregon be taking an unlimited number of fish that are heading to another state, and another country?
hawg boss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 02:27 PM   #3
tailhook
Cutthroat
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 30
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Nice response. Way to be on point.
tailhook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 02:30 PM   #4
FrogPond
Sturgeon
 
FrogPond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Albany
Posts: 3,658
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Current edition of STS has some pointers.
__________________
Josh
#1940

There is no greater fan of fly fishing than the worm. ~Patrick F. McManus, Never Sniff a Gift Fish, 1979
FrogPond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 02:33 PM   #5
the_dude
Tuna!
 
the_dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: tigard
Posts: 1,144
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

But don't most say "all hatchery fish must die"? If I remember the story right there is a place in Washington that you can keep 6 a day.
__________________
the hopeless and helpless fisherman
the_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 08:39 PM   #6
Vandal_57
Steelhead
 
Vandal_57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 226
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawg boss View Post
No.

I would support a rule change that requires the release of all Sockeye.

Last year there were 3 populations of Sockeye in the Columbia. This year there should be 4 with Sockeye expected to return to the Deschutes. Snake river fish are esa listed, Deschutes fish are a restoration project. There should be no harvest on either of these populations.

Okanagan River Sockeye are increasing thanks to a large restoration project.

http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/stories/okanagan.htm
http://www.obtwg.ca/pdf/ORRIBrochure.PDF

Does Washington even have a hatchery harvest card? If the answer is no, Why should people in Oregon be taking an unlimited number of fish that are heading to another state, and another country?


Release em'. Google Idaho's "Redfish Lake", named after the sockeye. I know over the past years the return has increased in numbers, but that system needs them to keep coming.
Vandal_57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 08:38 AM   #7
ccw
Ifish Nate
 
ccw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,338
Default

So let's close the Columbia and especially the ocean & Buoy 10 to protect the Grays chum run while we're at it?
No.

450,000 sockeye is huge. Plenty will escape. CW
__________________
"To strive, to seek, to find and not to yield."

(from Ulysses - Tennyson, 1833)
ccw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 11:28 AM   #8
Natester
Chromer
 
Natester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Woodland / Kalama, WA
Posts: 528
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccw View Post
So let's close the Columbia and especially the ocean & Buoy 10 to protect the Grays chum run while we're at it?
No.

450,000 sockeye is huge. Plenty will escape. CW

Exactly!!!

Lets get this Thread back on track!

I am thinking of fishing shallow with a small spin and glow with the hook tipped with a small dyed shrimp.

How soon do you think they will be in the lower river?
__________________
Since two-thirds of the earths surface is water therefore God intended us to spend two-thirds of our time fishing.

Last edited by Natester; 06-02-2012 at 11:29 AM. Reason: spelling
Natester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 12:17 PM   #9
luguando
Chromer
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Longview, WA
Posts: 748
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

[QUOTE=Natester;4142657] Exactly!!!

Lets get this Thread back on track!

I am thinking of fishing shallow with a small spin and glow with the hook tipped with a small dyed shrimp.

How soon do you think they will be in the lower river?[/QUOTE

I like the way you're thinking. I went to Bobs Sporting Goods a couple years ago and talked to a couple fisherman who were having success catching the sockeyes from the bank near Willow Grove. They were using small pink spin and glows with mylar wings and tipping the hook with a piece of nightcrawler. I'd be more inclined to tip the hook with a piece of dyed shrimp (cocktail or prawn) but that's what they told me. They were fishing in relatively shallow water (15' or less). That's all the info I was able to get from them but I was told by Brad (manager of Bobs and owner/manufacturer of many fine lures/products) that those guys were legitimate. It's worth a try. Bill Herzog's article in the recent STS magazine has some good ideas as well.
luguando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 01:22 PM   #10
Quiet Riot
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia County
Posts: 1,642
Default

If you look at the current dam counts, and how fast the run typically peaks, it should give you a good idea on when to go after them.....
__________________
www.aluminumworksbyjd.com
Quiet Riot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 01:54 PM   #11
hawg boss
Tuna!
 
hawg boss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 1,341
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccw View Post
So let's close the Columbia and especially the ocean & Buoy 10 to protect the Grays chum run while we're at it?
No.

450,000 sockeye is huge. Plenty will escape. CW
He asked for opinions and I gave mine.

Do you see anything wrong with putting wild, and/or esa listed salmon on a hatchery tag?

Uglygreen, why do you believe that most of the Columbia Sockeye are hatchery fish? I know they plant a lot of unfed fry, but are you sure that most of them are hatchery fish?
hawg boss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 02:23 PM   #12
the_dude
Tuna!
 
the_dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: tigard
Posts: 1,144
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

A recent article in Northwest Sportsman talks a lot about them and summer run steelhead.
__________________
the hopeless and helpless fisherman
the_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 03:23 PM   #13
Fishouttawater
Steelhead
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 136
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

We're not talking about the most willing of biters, here. Habitat, both ocean and in-river, have a lot more to do with the health of columbia basin sockeye populations than a presence or lack of sport harvest. Especially when you consider how fast their run peaks and falls off.

The way I see it, the few hundred pikeminnow I kill every year combined with the MAYBE 2 or 3 sockeye I end up keeping puts me firmly in the black, as far as sockeye conservation goes .

As far as targeting them, I think the depth of water is less important than where in the water column your bait is being presented...so long as the bait is small, red, with a touch of flash.
__________________
"Nature has given us two eyes, two ears, and but one tongue, to the end that we should hear and see more than we speak."
- Socrates
Fishouttawater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 03:37 PM   #14
scottsduckboat
Chromer
 
scottsduckboat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the boat or on the bank
Posts: 535
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Had luck with small blue spin glos with prawn tails last year that were little closer to shore targeting steelhead.

Buddy mentioned using a red or green bead catching a good number of sockeye while targeting shad.
scottsduckboat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 05:00 PM   #15
Wreckless
King Salmon
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hillsboro OR
Posts: 6,166
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

The only Sockeye I've ever caught on the Columbia was while Steelhead fishing with a spinner. #3 red french blade and Ultrabite. In about 14' of water.

__________________
Owner/Operator: "I Can't Believe It's A Guide Service".

"Today's the day"......Mel Fisher
Wreckless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 06:49 PM   #16
the_dude
Tuna!
 
the_dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: tigard
Posts: 1,144
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

I'm thinking of giving it a try along with summer steelhead. Gonna take a few thinks to try. Maybe they might hit the same things as kokes
__________________
the hopeless and helpless fisherman
the_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 07:36 PM   #17
wildbill79
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 139
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

000 or 00 herring dodger with a 10-18'' leader and a small smile blade with a red coon shrimp tail and lots of krill oil. We catch LOTS this way
wildbill79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 08:16 PM   #18
ccw
Ifish Nate
 
ccw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,338
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildbill79 View Post
000 or 00 herring dodger with a 10-18'' leader and a small smile blade with a red coon shrimp tail and lots of krill oil. We catch LOTS this way

What's a "small smile blade" ? Pics?

Thanks, CCW
__________________
"To strive, to seek, to find and not to yield."

(from Ulysses - Tennyson, 1833)
ccw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 08:22 PM   #19
SGIndigo
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 376
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildbill79 View Post
000 or 00 herring dodger with a 10-18'' leader and a small smile blade with a red coon shrimp tail and lots of krill oil. We catch LOTS this way
On anchor or trolling? I imagine there's a bead or two between the smile and the hook, right?

Maybe I should just upsize kokanee gear a tad?
SGIndigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 08:24 PM   #20
SGIndigo
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 376
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccw View Post
What's a "small smile blade" ? Pics?

Thanks, CCW
They're the little wings made by Mack's tackle.

SGIndigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 09:10 PM   #21
Fshklr
Tuna
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,275
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

steelhead gear and divers.....they don't travel the bottom and are usually suspended.

We did okay last yr just plunking spinglos and wobblers with 8' droppers you would see a few now and again.

The diver will help impart action as well....finding the correct depth and terminal gear will be the hard part.

Have used #4 spin glos in the past but did better later in the season with #6's with a sandshrimp tail.

As small as they are I won't bother this yr...I've caught bigger kokanee locally.
__________________
Oregon Yellowtail 2010
Fshklr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 07:38 AM   #22
ccw
Ifish Nate
 
ccw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,338
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Please a pic of how the smile blade appears rigged. I see one hole and a notch.... is this just above the hook? Thx. CW
__________________
"To strive, to seek, to find and not to yield."

(from Ulysses - Tennyson, 1833)
ccw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 09:17 AM   #23
SGIndigo
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 376
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccw View Post
Please a pic of how the smile blade appears rigged. I see one hole and a notch.... is this just above the hook? Thx. CW
This is how they're rigged for kokanee. They are also used for Walleye crawler rigs, and some people even put them above herring for springers. All you need is a single bead above the hook, like any other spinner blade. How many beads above a shrimped hook for Columbia sockeye is the info I don't have.

SGIndigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 10:29 AM   #24
Skipper Cole
Chromer
 
Skipper Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 926
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

I saw a bunch of them caught a few days last summer, plunking for summersteel on the CR.

The guys that were catching them were running really small spinglos, size 6 and smaller, bright reds, running them off of the bottom rig on a shorter leader than I would normally run.

I plan on targeting them this year once folks start catching them... tasty little suckers.
__________________

Skipper Cole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 11:31 AM   #25
wildbill79
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 139
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGIndigo View Post
On anchor or trolling? I imagine there's a bead or two between the smile and the hook, right?

Maybe I should just upsize kokanee gear a tad?
Depending on where we are fishing but both trolled and on anchor. Yes there is a couple beads between the smile blade/spin-n-glo to a #2 hook. Sockeye seem to suspend in the top 15 feet of the water column in my experience. I catch fish as shallow as 3 feet deep.
wildbill79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 04:16 PM   #26
Doublelung
Tuna!
 
Doublelung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,739
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

#4 or #6 SNG's in red, pink, orange, and other bright colors tipped with a piece of purple/red dyed prawn and your scent of choice. I like to run a double setup plunked from the shore. Don't cast too far from shore, they're easy to over-cast. You'll also catch steelhead this way.

They are one of the best eating fish there is imo.
Doublelung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 04:20 PM   #27
the_dude
Tuna!
 
the_dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: tigard
Posts: 1,144
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Sounds like I have a little shopping to.

I was thinking about trying some small spinners like is use for sea run cutts too.
__________________
the hopeless and helpless fisherman
the_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 04:30 PM   #28
Big TULE
Ifish Nate
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Hockinson, WA.
Posts: 2,395
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

O.K. all the advice is great. Just getting out there and getting a line in the water will increase your odds.

What i do, and i have done very well for sockeye. I use #6 pink S-N-G with pink mylar wings, or the fire red body with mylar wings, below it i put the smallest pink hootchie, to keep the hootchie from sliding down the hook i put a bead on the line before i slide the hootchie down, then another small bead between the hootchie and sng. Then i use a little krill scent.
Big TULE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 04:31 PM   #29
SGIndigo
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 376
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Interesting. One thing we've learned fishing for Kokes with a dodger and hoochie is to go short, and stiff. Kokes aren't leader shy and heavier, stiffer line imparts more action to the lure than thin, limp line. Some people go as high as 30#. I think 15# is probably a good place to start, then. I suppose the higher you go, the less Steelhead you would catch.
SGIndigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 04:37 PM   #30
Big TULE
Ifish Nate
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Hockinson, WA.
Posts: 2,395
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

i always use a sliding sng setup for sockeye. So my bottom sng is for steelhead, the upper is for sockeye. Although i have caught steelhead on my upper rig also.
Big TULE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 05:48 PM   #31
sandy_slayer
Steelhead
 
sandy_slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Portland
Posts: 398
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

I use 30 lb big game for steelhead and never had a problem hooking fish. And in my experience i catch all my sockeye very close to the bottom. There are many different techniques that people dont know. Try stuff new and dont under look little spinners
sandy_slayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 05:49 PM   #32
sandy_slayer
Steelhead
 
sandy_slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Portland
Posts: 398
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Plunking i use 30 lb that is little tribs is a diff story
sandy_slayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 04:33 PM   #33
alamarkid
Steelhead
 
alamarkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 155
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

00 to 000 dodger leader lenth of the dodger/ foucus on pinks an reds. smiley blade. trolling as slow as you can go, raw prawns with a little pautzkee's fire cure on it. One major piont with the prawn meat thread it between the two hook set up you will hook more fish. I love sockeye
alamarkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 04:36 PM   #34
Nitroholic
Coho
 
Nitroholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 77
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

great biters in the ocean, not so good in the river
Nitroholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 07:26 PM   #35
SGIndigo
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 376
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by alamarkid View Post
00 to 000 dodger leader lenth of the dodger/ foucus on pinks an reds. smiley blade. trolling as slow as you can go, raw prawns with a little pautzkee's fire cure on it. One major piont with the prawn meat thread it between the two hook set up you will hook more fish. I love sockeye
I was thinking of possibly using a side-drifting style rig, with the egg loop on the front hook, followed by a corkie and another hook, putting the prawn through the egg loop, with a smile in front of it? Think that would work? I already have plenty of side-drifting rigs I could modify easily enough...
SGIndigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 02:46 PM   #36
alamarkid
Steelhead
 
alamarkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 155
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

very close to a side drifting rig not sure about the corky? I use a tuff of yarn lenght of the hooks to grab teeth an hold scent. up here in central washington we kill'em on that. but, i do beleive they get easier to catch the longer they are in fresh water. they become more agreesive.
alamarkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 11:20 AM   #37
Salmon Mike
Tuna!
 
Salmon Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,198
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uglygreen View Post
So, I have caught Sockeye incidentially while Summer Steelhead fishing. I know thy are not great biters, but wanted to hear ideas for targeting these tasty little fish.

1) Anyone had any consistant luck with Columbia River Sockeye?

2) What methods and rigging seem to work best?

3) As we have to tag Sockeye but they don't have to be clipped as most are unclipped hatchery fish, would you support a rule change to allow recording on a hatchery harvest card?
Thank you for starting this thread!!!!! Just the info i have been looking for. And thank you to all who have contributed!!
Salmon Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 02:29 PM   #38
CKthumper
Tuna!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cornelius, OR
Posts: 1,207
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Thought this might useful again.
__________________
It's a great day in the neighborhood
CKthumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 04:11 PM   #39
FishoDano
Tuna!
 
FishoDano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SW WA
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitroholic View Post
great biters in the ocean, not so good in the river
This picture is from just yesterday, posted it on the summer salmon thread as well. But also notice the (9) sockeye, I completely disagree with your comment, figuring out tactics on how to target them in the lower river in recent years is simply the issue.

Several things play apart, water depth, bait presentation, bottom structure, water temp I could go on on. We had 2 of those sockeye come off K-14 Kwikfish, that combined with they're willingness to engulf prawns leads me to believe they are great biters in the river!


Majority of the fish were caught on sNg's prawn's.
__________________
"Whatever you do don't chase em, take em head first!"
FishoDano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 04:57 PM   #40
Biteme
Tuna!
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: keizer, or, marion
Posts: 1,642
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

wheres paul?
__________________
Dennis H
Biteme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 05:30 PM   #41
SGIndigo
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 376
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by FishoDano View Post
]Majority of the fish were caught on sNg's prawn's.
Geez. Just SnG hanging in the current, or off a dodger? I tried last weekend. I anchored in 7', tried to fish in 5' and had no confidence whatsoever what I was doing was right. Of course, I caught nothing, saw nothing.

Hung SnG/prawn tail off a dodger off the downrigger a few feet down, since I needed to get it down, but still swing freely, which it wouldn't do as easily in that shallow water if weighted with lead.

I still feel completely lost.
SGIndigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 06:04 PM   #42
FishoDano
Tuna!
 
FishoDano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SW WA
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGIndigo View Post
Geez. Just SnG hanging in the current, or off a dodger? I tried last weekend. I anchored in 7', tried to fish in 5' and had no confidence whatsoever what I was doing was right. Of course, I caught nothing, saw nothing.

Hung SnG/prawn tail off a dodger off the downrigger a few feet down, since I needed to get it down, but still swing freely, which it wouldn't do as easily in that shallow water if weighted with lead.

I still feel completely lost.
Anchored in 18-18.5 FOW with 4ft leader and 1ft dropper. No dodger's were used.
__________________
"Whatever you do don't chase em, take em head first!"
FishoDano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 08:18 PM   #43
Quiet Riot
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia County
Posts: 1,642
Default

I tried for a couple hours the other day with my girls but just got sturgeon sucking down my shrimp sng's in 14 fow. Oh well, was fun with light steely rods. Might hafta go get serious about them later this week
__________________
www.aluminumworksbyjd.com
Quiet Riot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 06:29 AM   #44
Swifty27
Chromer
 
Swifty27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pasco, WA
Posts: 817
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

I'm going to give it my first try up here in Tri-Cities this season. I'm really excited. Really, everyone should be. I don't want to jinx it, but there looks to be a lot of fish in the water.

__________________
Hopefully today will the yesterday that everyone talks about tomorrow.
Ifish member # 26x10^3+7*111-sqrt(16)
Swifty27 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 07:56 AM   #45
extremefish22
Cutthroat
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: camas/cheney
Posts: 28
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vandal_57 View Post


Release em'. Google Idaho's "Redfish Lake", named after the sockeye. I know over the past years the return has increased in numbers, but that system needs them to keep coming.
I agree with you vandal! It still needs more time for recovery. Watched this documentary a while ago, still watch it when i can.

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episo...-episode/6620/
extremefish22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 09:19 AM   #46
bscappell
Chromer
 
bscappell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chelan WA
Posts: 565
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by extremefish22 View Post
I agree with you vandal! It still needs more time for recovery. Watched this documentary a while ago, still watch it when i can.

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episo...-episode/6620/
so dont keep them because .4% of the fish are going to the snake? odds are slim sports fishers will catch one.....

The 2012 forecast for sockeye is for a record return of 462,000 fish to the Columbia River mouth. The forecast includes 28,800 Wenatchee stock, 431,300 Okanogan stock, and 1,900 Snake River stock.
bscappell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 10:00 AM   #47
Swifty27
Chromer
 
Swifty27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pasco, WA
Posts: 817
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by bscappell View Post
so dont keep them because .4% of the fish are going to the snake? odds are slim sports fishers will catch one.....

The 2012 forecast for sockeye is for a record return of 462,000 fish to the Columbia River mouth. The forecast includes 28,800 Wenatchee stock, 431,300 Okanogan stock, and 1,900 Snake River stock.
I like it. All you lower river guys shouldn't be allowed to fish them. Should be fine above the confluence with the Snake......hey, that works out perfectly for me

In all reality, I'm sure some biologist that knows more than I do looked at it and figured: For say 20,000 Sockeye caught, 0.4% = 80 fish bound for the Snake. That's 4.2% of the Snake run.....should be ok.

And to avoid polluting the thread, I will omit my sea lion comment.
__________________
Hopefully today will the yesterday that everyone talks about tomorrow.
Ifish member # 26x10^3+7*111-sqrt(16)
Swifty27 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 10:57 AM   #48
Jsteel
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 377
Default

Just curious - been at Bonneville Dam several days in the last week. Hundreds of people fishing with shad jigs, lots of shad caught, but not one sockeye that I have seen. Is it the lure? Do they run at different slots/depths than shad? I thought I would see the occasional sockeye, but it's only been shad.
Jsteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 02:30 PM   #49
JJ683
Coho
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 67
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGIndigo View Post
Geez. Just SnG hanging in the current, or off a dodger? I tried last weekend. I anchored in 7', tried to fish in 5' and had no confidence whatsoever what I was doing was right. Of course, I caught nothing, saw nothing.

Hung SnG/prawn tail off a dodger off the downrigger a few feet down, since I needed to get it down, but still swing freely, which it wouldn't do as easily in that shallow water if weighted with lead.

I still feel completely lost.

Find current seams close to the bank. 10-20 ft fo water....plunking gear. siz e 4SNG with a red shrimp.....
JJ683 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 07:26 AM   #50
Swifty27
Chromer
 
Swifty27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pasco, WA
Posts: 817
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ683 View Post
Find current seams close to the bank. 10-20 ft fo water....plunking gear. siz e 4SNG with a red shrimp.....
Like this?

__________________
Hopefully today will the yesterday that everyone talks about tomorrow.
Ifish member # 26x10^3+7*111-sqrt(16)
Swifty27 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 09:03 AM   #51
FishoDano
Tuna!
 
FishoDano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SW WA
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swifty27 View Post
Like this?

Like that. If confluences of fish come upriver and past there, with my best bet I'd do just as JJ683 said. Never know what'll happen?
__________________
"Whatever you do don't chase em, take em head first!"
FishoDano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 10:53 AM   #52
Swifty27
Chromer
 
Swifty27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pasco, WA
Posts: 817
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by FishoDano View Post
Like that. If confluences of fish come upriver and past there, with my best bet I'd do just as JJ683 said. Never know what'll happen?
I hope they do. Well, at least when there are more in the river, some should find their way over. I gave it a shot for about 1.5 hours after work yesterday. No luck, but it's still a little early.

For anyone familiar with Tri-Cites, I ran up to Ringold. The boat launch is underwater. The road to the lower launch is a mud bog with standing water too. There were some guys out on the point in chest waders, but they hadn't caught anything. There's no bank to fish with the water up in the trees. I ran up to Lot 5 and there's trees in the water too. You could probably fit a rod or two fishing right on top of the launch. It was too late in the day for me to drop a line. I should have taken pictures to share. Next time. Just to note, the water is really clear though.
__________________
Hopefully today will the yesterday that everyone talks about tomorrow.
Ifish member # 26x10^3+7*111-sqrt(16)
Swifty27 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 11:52 AM   #53
Stayin' Afloat
Coho
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Camas
Posts: 51
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

With nearly 20,000 Sockeye over Bonneville yesterday, has Frenchman's Bar area peaked?
__________________
"Stayin' Afloat"
Stayin' Afloat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 08:02 PM   #54
ccw
Ifish Nate
 
ccw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,338
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

the graph is looking strong. C.W.

__________________
"To strive, to seek, to find and not to yield."

(from Ulysses - Tennyson, 1833)
ccw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 08:33 PM   #55
PATRICK 11-14
Tuna!
 
PATRICK 11-14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon
Posts: 1,598
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccw View Post
the graph is looking strong. C.W.

No. 2 or 3 vibrax red blade brass or copper body in 20ft or less =sockeyes!!
For me!
__________________
100ton Master Mariner/Captain of "Reelentless"
PATRICK 11-14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 08:43 PM   #56
Incredible_Bulk
Tuna!
 
Incredible_Bulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 1,972
Default Re: Columbia River Sockeye Tech Thread

8" mesh nets seem to be pretty effective...

http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/OSCR...UMMER_2012.pdf
__________________
Member: Salem NW Steelheaders / Salem Chapter CCA http://www.salemnwsteelheaders.org

The journey of 1000 miles begins with a single step...
Incredible_Bulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Cast to



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:10 AM.

Terms of Service
Page generated in 0.63106 seconds with 12 queries